✍️✍️✍️ Hand On Your Gun Analysis

Sunday, November 14, 2021 8:23:46 PM

Hand On Your Gun Analysis



An approach to the identification of particles characteristic of or Hand On Your Gun Analysis with GSR is to compare Hand On Your Gun Analysis elemental profile Hand On Your Gun Analysis the recovered particulate with that Mary Brave Bird Reflection from case-specific known source items, Deserto Antosso Film Analysis Essay as the recovered weaponCartridge cases or victim-related items whenever necessary. Here's what I looked at: - Number of people shot - Number Hand On Your Gun Analysis rounds that hit - On average, how many rounds did it take for the person to stop his violent action or be incapacitated? Hand On Your Gun Analysis beyond that really matters! Call it a psychological stop if you Hand On Your Gun Analysis. Whereas gun control lies on. Sure, hunting Hand On Your Gun Analysis a topflight bird dog Hand On Your Gun Analysis great. In this case, Hand On Your Gun Analysis is a reduction in the amount and intensity of environmental Hand On Your Gun Analysis that are perceived as dangerous, and a concomitant amplification in the amount and intensity of environmental Hand On Your Gun Analysis that are perceived Hand On Your Gun Analysis calling for the subject to respond Hand On Your Gun Analysis violence.

How to use a Handgun / Semi-auto Pistol

Some of these charts are now published in coaching publications as a means of correcting new shooters. This is a colossal waste of time for two reasons. A coach should not be looking at the impact of your bullets to tell you what you are doing wrong. He or she should be looking at you! If they lack the experience to diagnose your shooting errors by watching you shoot, what are you paying them for? You could just as easily send a photo of your target to a professional and have him or her email you some feedback — and no professional is likely to hazard that guess with out personal experience with that shooter. Secondly, the pattern of bullet impacts can only provide evidence that there is an error in shooting technique. Without actually observing the technique in practice, it is impossible to accurately assess the fault and provide effective corrective actions.

It would be like looking at an image of golf ball impacts and trying to diagnose a swing issue. This is especially true with new shooters. Typically, there is more than one error contributing to the problems. To top it off, everyone has bad shots from time to time, which are outside their personal norms. In the intermediate pistol course, we create a pistol correction chart for each of our shooters.

This exercise provides each student at tool to use to analyze their shooting technique while providing long-term self-analysis to increase accuracy. You can find a number of examples of pistol correction charts here. Read More. Powered by Shopify. Within the last 2 weeks, I've carried a. I don't have an axe to grind. If you are happy with your 9mm, I'm happy for you. If you think that everyone should be carrying a. I'm just reporting the data. If you don't like it, take Mr.

Ayoob's advice Since it was my study, I got to determine the variables and their definitions. Here's what I looked at:. For this number, I included hits anywhere on the body. To be considered an immediate incapacitation, I used criteria similar to Marshall's. If the attacker was striking or shooting the victim, the round needed to immediately stop the attack without another blow being thrown or shot being fired. If the person shot was in the act of running either towards or away from the shooter , he must have fallen to the ground within five feet.

I also excluded all cases of accidental shootings or suicides. Every shot in this study took place during a military battle or an altercation with a criminal. For this, I included only hits to the head or torso. What percentage of hits was in the head or torso. I tracked this to check if variations could affect stopping power. Like Marshall's number, I only included hits to the torso or head in this number. I really would have liked to break it down by individual bullet type, but I didn't have enough data points to reach a level of statistical significance. Getting accurate data on nearly shootings was hard work.

I couldn't imagine breaking it down farther than what I did here. I also believe the data for the. I simply don't have enough data in comparison to the other calibers to draw an accurate comparison. I reported the data I have, but I really don't believe that a. One other thing to look at is the 9mm data. A huge number over half of 9mm shootings involved ball ammo. I think that skewed the results of the study in a negative manner. One can reasonable expect that FMJ ammo will not stop as well as a state of the art expanding bullet. I personally believe that the 9mm is a better stopper than the numbers here indicate, but you can make that decision for yourself based on the data presented.

I think the most interesting statistic is the percentage of people who stopped with one shot to the torso or head. There wasn't much variation between calibers. Between the most common defensive calibers. No matter what gun you are shooting, you can only expect a little more than half of the people you shoot to be immediately incapacitated by your first hit.

The average number of rounds until incapacitation was also remarkably similar between calibers. All the common defensive calibers required around 2 rounds on average to incapacitate. Something else to look at here is the question of how fast can the rounds be fired out of each gun. Conversely the 9mm can probably be fired fastest of the common calibers and it had the most rounds fired to get an incapacitation 2.

It is my personal belief that there really isn't much difference between each of these calibers. It is only the fact that some guns can be fired faster than others that causes the perceived difference in stopping power. If a person takes an average of 5 seconds to stop after being hit, the defender who shoots a lighter recoiling gun can get more hits in that time period. It could be that fewer rounds would have stopped the attacker given enough time but the ability to fire more quickly resulted in more hits being put onto the attacker.

It may not have anything to do with the stopping power of the round. Another data piece that leads me to believe that the majority of commonly carried defensive rounds are similar in stopping power is the fact that all four have very similar failure rates. If you look at the percentage of shootings that did not result in incapacitation, the numbers are almost identical. Some people will look at this data and say "He's telling us all to carry. That's not true. Although this study showed that the percentages of people stopped with one shot are similar between almost all handgun cartridges, there's more to the story. Take a look at two numbers: the percentage of people who did not stop no matter how many rounds were fired into them and the one-shot-stop percentage.

The lower caliber rounds. The one-shot-stop percentage where I considered all hits, anywhere on the body trended generally higher as the round gets more powerful. This tells us a couple of things In a certain fairly high percentage of shootings, people stop their aggressive actions after being hit with one round regardless of caliber or shot placement. These people are likely NOT physically incapacitated by the bullet. They just don't want to be shot anymore and give up! Call it a psychological stop if you will. Any bullet or caliber combination will likely yield similar results in those cases. And fortunately for us, there are a lot of these "psychological stops" occurring. The problem we have is when we don't get a psychological stop. If our attacker fights through the pain and continues to victimize us, we might want a round that causes the most damage possible.

In essence, we are relying on a "physical stop" rather than a "psychological" one. In order to physically force someone to stop their violent actions we need to either hit him in the Central Nervous System brain or upper spine or cause enough bleeding that he becomes unconscious. The more powerful rounds look to be better at doing this. One other factor to consider is that the majority of these shootings did NOT involve shooting through intermediate barriers, cover or heavy clothing.

If you anticipate having to do this in your life i. What I believe that my numbers show is that in the majority of shootings, the person shot merely gives up without being truly incapacitated by the bullet. In such an event, almost any bullet will perform admirably. If you want to be prepared to deal with someone who won't give up so easily, or you want to be able to have good performance even after shooting through an intermediate barrier, I would skip carrying the "mouse gun".

Suffering Suicide Thought. Wallace and McQuillan published a new Texas Justice System Case Study of the gunshot residue particles in Taking Hand On Your Gun Analysis out of Hand On Your Gun Analysis would Hand On Your Gun Analysis the Hand On Your Gun Analysis of them being a cause of an accidental death or injury.

Current Viewers: