✍️✍️✍️ Compare And Contrast Stalin And Superpowers

Wednesday, May 26, 2021 2:02:58 PM

Compare And Contrast Stalin And Superpowers

They created a thriving culture that would Compare And Contrast Stalin And Superpowers later Hay Fever Analysis civilizations such as the Aztecs. The article is just Compare And Contrast Stalin And Superpowers I tend to pass Compare And Contrast Stalin And Superpowers off Compare And Contrast Stalin And Superpowers "leftists" as proto-Marxist propaganda, The Victorian Tea Party. Lesson 12 Work on two assignments. Hitler banned everyone else that he promised to work with and killed anyone else that disagreed in the Night of the Long Knives.

Everytime Batman Has Gotten Super Powers (1939 - 2018)

Khrushchev and Zhukov needed one another to eliminate their mutual enemies in the Soviet political elite. In , Zhukov helped Khrushchev to eliminate Lavrenty Beria , [1] then a First Vice-Premier , who was promptly executed in Moscow, as well as several other figures of Stalin's circle. Soon Khrushchev ordered the release of millions of political prisoners from the Gulag camps. Under Khrushchev's rule the number of prisoners in the Soviet Union was decreased, according to some writers, from 13 million to 5 million people. Khrushchev also promoted and groomed Leonid Brezhnev , [14] whom he brought to the Kremlin and introduced to Stalin in Brezhnev in return helped Khrushchev by tipping the balance of power during several critical confrontations with the conservative hard-liners, including the ouster of pro-Stalinists headed by Molotov and Malenkov.

Khrushchev denounced Stalin in his speech On the Cult of Personality and Its Consequences , delivered at the closed session of the 20th Party Congress , behind closed doors, after midnight on 25 February Khrushchev's speech was the strongest effort ever in the USSR to bring political change, [1] at that time, after several decades of fear of Stalin's rule, that took countless innocent lives.

Khrushchev's speech had angered many of his powerful enemies, thus igniting another round of ruthless power struggle within the Soviet Communist Party. Khrushchev's denouncement of Stalin came as a shock to the Soviet people. Many in Georgia , Stalin's homeland, especially the young generation, bred on the panegyrics and permanent praise of the "genius" of Stalin, perceived it as a national insult. In March , a series of spontaneous rallies to mark the third anniversary of Stalin's death quickly evolved into an uncontrollable mass demonstration and political demands such as the change of the central government in Moscow and calls for the independence of Georgia from the Soviet Union appeared, [20] leading to the Soviet army intervention and bloodshed in the streets of Tbilisi.

The Hungarian Revolution of was suppressed by a massive invasion of Soviet tanks and Red Army troops in Budapest. The street fighting against the invading Red Army caused thousands of casualties among Hungarian civilians and militia, as well as hundreds of the Soviet military personnel killed. The attack by the Soviet Red Army also caused massive emigration from Hungary , as hundreds of thousands of Hungarians had fled as refugees.

At the same time, the Polish October emerged as the political and social climax in Poland. Such democratic changes in the internal life of Poland were also perceived with fear and anger in Moscow, where the rulers did not want to lose control, fearing the political threat to Soviet security and power in Eastern Europe. A faction of the Soviet communist party was enraged by Khrushchev's speech in , and rejected Khrushchev's de-Stalinization and liberalization of Soviet society. One year after Khrushchev's secret speech, the Stalinists attempted to oust Khrushchev from the leadership position in the Soviet Communist Party. Khrushchev's enemies considered him hypocritical as well as ideologically wrong, given Khrushchev's involvement in Stalin's Great Purges , and other similar events as one of Stalin's favorites.

They believed that Khrushchev's policy of peaceful coexistence would leave the Soviet Union open to attack. Vyacheslav Molotov , Lazar Kaganovich , Georgy Malenkov , and Dmitri Shepilov , [17] who joined at the last minute after Kaganovich convinced him the group had a majority, attempted to depose Khrushchev as First Secretary of the Party in May However, Khrushchev had used Marshal Georgy Zhukov again. Khrushchev was saved by several strong appearances in his support — especially powerful was support from both Zhukov and Mikoyan. Khrushchev's attempts in reforming the Soviet industrial infrastructure led to his clashes with professionals in most branches of the Soviet economy. His reform of administrative organization caused him more problems. In a politically motivated move to weaken the central state bureaucracy in , Khrushchev replaced the industrial ministries in Moscow with regional Councils of People's Economy, sovnarkhozes , causing himself many new enemies among the ranks in Soviet government.

Khrushchev's power, although indisputable, had never been comparable to that of Stalin's, and eventually began to fade. Many of the new officials who came into the Soviet hierarchy, such as Mikhail Gorbachev , were younger, better educated, and more independent thinkers. In , Khrushchev introduced the concept of a minimum wage. The idea was met with much criticism with communist hardliners, they claimed that the minimum wage was so small, that most people were still underpaid in reality. The next step was a contemplated financial reform. However, Khrushchev stopped short of real monetary reform, when he ordered the replacement of old money bearing portraits of Stalin, and made a simple redenomination of the ruble in In , Khrushchev finalized his battle against Stalin: the body of the dictator was removed from Lenin's Mausoleum on the Red Square and then buried outside the walls of the Kremlin.

The removal of Stalin's body consolidated pro-Stalinists against Khrushchev, [1] [14] and alienated even his loyal apprentices, such as Leonid Brezhnev. After the early s, Soviet society enjoyed a series of cultural and sports events and entertainment of unprecedented scale, such as the first Spartakiad , as well as several innovative film comedies, such as Carnival Night , and several popular music festivals. Some classical musicians, filmmakers and ballet stars were allowed to make appearances outside the Soviet Union in order to better represent its culture and society to the world. In the summer of , just a few months after Khrushchev's secret speech, Moscow became the center of the first Spartakiad of the Peoples of the USSR.

The event was made pompous in the Soviet style: Moscow hosted large sports teams and groups of fans in national costumes who came from all Union republics. Khrushchev used the event to accentuate his new political and social goals, and to show himself as a new leader who was completely different from Stalin. It was the first World Festival of Youth and Students held in the Soviet Union, which was opening its doors for the first time to the world. The festival attracted 34, people from countries.

In , the first International Tchaikovsky Competition was held in Moscow. The winner was American pianist Van Cliburn , who gave sensational performances of Russian music. Khrushchev personally approved giving the top award to the American musician. Khrushchev's Thaw opened the Soviet society to a degree that allowed some foreign movies, books, art and music. Some previously banned writers and composers, such as Anna Akhmatova and Mikhail Zoshchenko , among others, were brought back to public life, as the official Soviet censorship policies had changed.

Books by some internationally recognized authors, such as Ernest Hemingway , were published in millions of copies to satisfy the interest of readers in the USSR. In , Khrushchev personally approved the publication of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn 's story One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich , which became a sensation, and made history as the first uncensored publication about Gulag labor camps. There was still a lot of agitation against religion that had temporarily halted during the war effort and the years after toward the end of Stalin's rule.

Censorship of the arts relaxed throughout the Soviet Union. During this time of liberalization, Russian composers, performers, and listeners of music experienced a newfound openness in musical expression which led to the foundation of an unofficial music scene from the mid s to the s. Despite these liberalizing reforms in music, many argue that Khrushchev's legislation of the arts was based, not enough on freedom of expression of the Soviet people per se, and too much on his own personal tastes. Following the emergence of some unconventional, avant-garde music as a result of his reforms, on 8 March , Khrushchev delivered a speech which began to reverse some of his de-Stalinization reforms, in which he stated: "We flatly reject this cacophonous music.

Our people can't use this garbage as a tool for their ideology. Nonetheless, despite Khrushchev's inconsistent liberalization of musical expression, his speeches were not so much "restrictions" as "exhortations". The composers of this time, for example, were able to access scores by composers such as Arnold Schoenberg and Pierre Boulez , gaining inspiration from and imitating previously concealed musical scores. As Soviet composers gained access to new scores and were given a taste of freedom of expression during the late s, two separate groups began to emerge.

One group wrote predominantly "official" music which was "sanctioned, nourished, and supported by the Composers' Union". The second group wrote "unofficial", "left", "avant-garde", or "underground" music, marked by a general state of opposition against the Soviet Union. Although both groups are widely considered to be interdependent, many regard the unofficial music scene as more independent and politically influential than the former in the context of the Thaw. The unofficial music that emerged during the Thaw was marked by the attempt, whether successful or unsuccessful, to reinterpret and reinvigorate the "battle of form and content" of the classical music of the period. Rather, the music was considered unofficial within a context that counteracted, contradicted, and redefined the socialist realist requirements from within their official means and spaces.

Unofficial music emerged in two distinct phases. The first phase of unofficial music was marked by performances of "escapist" pieces. From a composer's perspective, these works were escapist in the sense that their sound and structure withdrew from the demands of socialist realism. Additionally, pieces developed during this phase of unofficial music allowed the listeners the ability to escape the familiar sounds that Soviet officials officially sanctioned. Throughout the musical Thaw, the generation of "young composers" who had matured their musical tastes with broader access to music that had previously been censored was the prime focus of the unofficial music scene.

The Thaw allowed these composers the freedom to access old and new scores, especially those originating in the Western avant-garde. Socialist realist music was widely considered "boring", and the unofficial concerts that the young composers presented allowed the listeners "a means of circumventing, reinterpreting, and undercutting the dominant socialist realist aesthetic codes". Despite the seemingly rebellious nature of the unofficial music of the Thaw, historians debate whether the unofficial music that emerged during this time should truly be considered as resistance to the Soviet system.

While a number of participants in unofficial concerts "claimed them to be a liberating activity, connoting resistance, opposition, or protest of some sort", [29] some critics claim that rather than taking an active role in opposing Soviet power, composers of unofficial music simply "withdrew" from the demands of the socialist realist music and chose to ignore the norms of the system. Regardless of the intentions of the composers, the effect of their music on audiences throughout the Soviet Union and abroad "helped audiences imagine alternative possibilities to those suggested by Soviet authorities, principally through the ubiquitous stylistic tropes of socialist realism".

Even after Khrushchev's fall from power in October , the freedoms that composers, performers, and listeners felt through unofficial concerts lasted into the s. However, despite the powerful role that unofficial music played in the Soviet Union during the Thaw, much of the music that was composed during that time continued to be controlled. As a result of this, a great deal of this unofficial music remains undocumented. Consequently, much of what we know now about unofficial music in the Thaw can be sourced only through interviews with those composers, performers, and listeners who witnessed the unofficial music scene during the Thaw.

With the exception of the arch Stalinist and anti-Titoist Albania , Romania was the only country where intellectuals avoided an open clash with the regime, influenced partly by the lack of any earlier revolt in post-war Romania that would have forced the regime to make concessions. The tensions were able to thaw because of Khrushchev's de-Stalinization of the USSR and peaceful coexistence theory and also because of US President Eisenhower 's cautious attitude and peace attempts.

The leaders' attitudes allowed them to, as Khrushchev put it, "break the ice. Khrushchev's Thaw developed largely as a result of Khrushchev's theory of peaceful co-existence which believed the two superpowers USA and USSR and their ideologies could co-exist together, without war peacefully. Khrushchev had created the theory of peaceful existence in an attempt to reduce hostility between the two superpowers. He tried to prove peaceful coexistence by attending international peace conferences, such as the Geneva Summit, and by traveling internationally, such as his trip to USA's Camp David in This spirit of co-operation was severely damaged by the U-2 incident.

The Soviet presentation of downed pilot Francis Gary Powers at the May Paris Peace Summit and Eisenhower's refusal to apologize ended much of the progress of this era. Then Khrushchev approved the construction of the Berlin Wall in Further deterioration of the Thaw and decay of Khrushchev's international political standing happened during the Cuban Missile Crisis in At that time, the Soviet and international media were making two completely opposite pictures of reality, while the world was at the brink of a nuclear war. Kennedy [34] helped to end the crisis, Khrushchev's political image in the West was damaged. Khrushchev's Thaw caused unprecedented social, cultural and economic transformations in the Soviet Union.

The 60s generation actually started in the s, with their uncensored poetry, songs and books publications. Many new social trends stemmed from that festival. Many Russian women became involved in love affairs with men visiting from all over the world, what resulted in the so-called "inter-baby boom" in Moscow and Leningrad. The festival also brought new styles and fashions that caused further spread of youth subculture called " stilyagi ". The festival also "revolutionized" the underground currency trade and boosted the black market. Their poetry and songs broadened the public consciousness of the Soviet people and pushed guitars and tape recorders to masses, so the Soviet people became exposed to independent channels of information and public mentality was eventually updated in many ways.

Khrushchev finally liberated millions of peasants; by his order the Soviet government gave them identifications, passports, and thus allowed them to move out of poor villages to big cities. Massive housing construction, known as khrushchevkas , were undertaken during the s and s. Millions of cheap and basic residential blocks of low-end flats were built all over the Soviet Union to accommodate the largest migration ever in the Soviet history, when masses of landless peasants moved to Soviet cities.

The move caused a dramatic change of the demographic picture in the USSR, and eventually finalized the decay of peasantry in Russia. In , the American National Exhibition came to Moscow with the goals of displaying United States' productivity and prosperity. The latent goal of the Americans was to get the Soviet Union to reduce production of heavy industry. If the Soviet Union started putting their resources towards producing consumer goods, it would also mean a reduction of war materials. An estimated number of over twenty million Soviet citizens viewed the twenty-three U.

The "Khrushchev regime had promised abundance to secure its legitimacy. American sociologist David Riesman coined the term "Operation Abundance" also known as the "Nylon War" which predicted "Russian people would not long tolerate masters who gave them tanks and spies instead of vacuum cleaners and beauty parlors. Riesman's theory came true to some extent as the Soviet culture changed to include consumer goods such as vacuum cleaners , washing machines , and sewing machines. These items were specifically targeted at women in the Soviet Union with the idea that they relieved women of their domestic burden. Additionally an interest in changing the western image of a dowdy Russian woman led to the cultural acceptance of beauty products.

The modern Russian woman wanted the clothing, cosmetics, and hairstyles available to Western women. Under the Thaw, beauty shops selling cosmetics and perfume , which had previously only been available to the wealthy, became available for common women. Khrushchev responded to consumerism more diplomatically than to cultural consumption. In response to American jazz Khrushchev stated: "I don't like jazz. When I hear jazz, it's as if I had gas on the stomach.

The disintegration of the Russian army [] began, which began to rapidly lose its combat capability. What can the tsar's generals be proud of? By and large, only one Brusilosky breakthrough, which was exalted to the skies. The Germans invaded Russian territory and 30 August September 12 they occupied Suwalki, and on September 4 17 they occupied Augustow [21]. Fitter65 8 October The tsarist generals did not have a single shameful cauldron of the model of Kiev and Vyazemsky, where in a week they surrendered in half a million.

So you will decide whether the original exists or not, and who were the Bolsheviks on the second day after the abdication of the tsar? Well, then yes, only these tsarist generals somehow, with the support of foreign states, lost the civil war they started. Foul skeptic 8 October Shaw, you didn't get it right the first time? Once again: its original does NOT exist, i. Olgovich Yesterday, Explain how the fact that the original was not preserved means that the order was not prepared at a meeting of the Petrograd Soviet? Kozak Za Bugra 7 October For everyone who wants to talk about the disaster, I wish to study the history and figures The USSR lost about 8 million soldiers in battle and 4 million were taken prisoner, for one soldier in captivity two were killed with weapons, according to "liberal" calculations that is, counting only the Germans the ratio of combat losses of Germany to the USSR is 1d4 I consider a maximum of 1k 2.

This is declared a shame and humiliation. And what about heroic France against this background? For a month and a half, she lost thousand soldiers killed and 1,7 million were taken prisoner, that is, for one killed soldier, almost five were taken prisoner, while the Germans lost 30 thousand soldiers the ratio of combat losses of Germany to France 1k10!!! For 1. That is, in the First World War, Russia with the tsar priest had soldiers who did not want to fight for the glory of the tsar who had involved the country in a war they did not need, and this is evident in the fact that Russia is the only country where there are more prisoners than killed. But under the "bloody" regime of the USSR, the only European country where more soldiers died than were taken prisoner, and this is an indicator And call it a catastrophe after comparing with the Poles, French, British, Belgians, Norwegians, etc.

So, by the way The article is good. The catastrophe was in the Russian Imperial Army, which not only lost the Russian-Japanese army, but also left its territories to the Germans, which the Red Army returned. In general, once again I am convinced of your ignorance of the history of the country that you are trying to cheat here. Read what was said in the orders at the expense of the surrounded Breslau and other Courland. We will not remember the surrounded Leningrad, this is not the Wehrmacht at Stalingrad.. Sorry, wrong: For example, in August , the Germans kept 9 divisions on the border with Russia, if I am not mistaken, and in the West they kept about 70 divisions.

Senior seaman 6 October The main goal of the Schlieffen Plan was to use the time difference required for full mobilization between France and Russia, which was estimated at about 2 months, to apply the principle of simultaneous war with only one enemy, breaking and forcing France to surrender first, and then Russia. However, it must be remembered that in addition to the Russian Empire, the Entente also consisted of two other great powers Great Britain and France of that time, one regional Italy and several small. Fat 6 October In fact, the Entente is an alliance of Russia and France. If you think that England was in the Entente, and was an ally of Russia and France, then you are generally a complete ignoramus.

Fat 7 October The contradictory trends in the development of the Triple Concord, observed in , ultimately led to the birth of a new quality. Under the influence of the growth of international contradictions and the danger posed by the Triple Alliance, the formation of a military-political alliance of a "new type", different from the "situational coalitions" of the th century, was outlined. This process was on the rise and reached its peak at the turn of XNUMX, marked by several acute international conflicts Agadir crisis, Italian-Turkish and the first Balkan wars. The degree of coordination of the participants' actions and the level of mutual obligations achieved during this period virtually ruled out the possibility of their secession from the Entente and the reorientation of foreign policy towards Germany.

The third stage in the development of the Entente as a military-political union refers to the period of the First World War in The July crisis of , which led to the outbreak of this conflict, became the starting point in the evolution of the Entente from a closed club of three great powers, united in the struggle against the hegemonic aspirations of Germany, into a new, hitherto unknown form of an open multilateral military-political alliance with stable organizational forms. As the true scale and duration of the war became clear, it became necessary for the Entente powers to abandon their separate policy and accept certain obligations to their partners. The first such agreement was the agreement between Russia, England and France on the future partition of the Ottoman Empire, concluded through an exchange of memorandums in March-April By , the sides had fixed joint political goals in the ongoing world war.

Didn't claim! This is what you conjecture and assert it for me. Even Italy, being a member of the tripartite alliance, at first remained neutral, and then entered the war on the side of the Entente Such were the morals of the Allies then In , from the remnants of the enlarged Entente, after the victory that took on the role of "world government", the "League of Nations" was formed, with all the contradictions of interests of the countries participating in the agreement. The poster I have proposed is dated Why the devil I began to argue with you with you? I'm not asking myself You still do not understand the written text and are not able to understand anyone's words except your own.

It is impossible to urge you to return to the sinful earth from the flight of your imagination So you can enjoy it there - one at war with mills and encyclopedias. What did you understand there? Fat 8 October This is an indicator of my shiny sharp still young mind Are you jealous? Capercaillie lat. Tetrao urogallus is a large bird from the pheasant family, the order of chickens. The bird owes its name "capercaillie" to the well-known peculiarity of the male who is walking during the mating season to lose sensitivity and vigilance, which hunters often use. You are so alike With respect. Well, if you are young, then your ignorance is understandable. At 20, I myself did not know a lot of things in history and geopolitics. Read more and gain knowledge.

Anglo-French Union, concluded in And if you do not know this, then you are not just a complete ignoramus, but also a militant :. It was accompanied by secret articles. France renounced claims to the coast of Newfoundland. In exchange, Britain transferred certain territories in Africa to France. Senior seaman 7 October That's what it was called, whether you like it or not. There was no other "Entente cordiale". My dear man, you can dig as much as you like to the wording, remember how all the trolls do about spelling, this does not change the essence.

On the merits of the question, you have nothing to say. The rest is talk in favor of the poor. Even a cat should be in the subject. And in 15 years Germany will come again and again will kill tens of millions of our compatriots. Bolshevik national traitors merged their country, leaving it with coupons for women's panties, for food, a dead village, an endangered people and the borders of the 17th century.

And where is the decision of the court, tribunal, conference on Germany's guilt in unleashing PMA? Olgovich's stupidity reached the international level, about Moldavian, but invariably Russophobic. Well, what a Russophobic mess in Olgovich's head, he is talking about and he is rubbing it in about So, Ol'govich, the tsaristushka was drunk from the throne by his own general-ministers-hangers-on. No, well, it is clear that the Anglophile Russophobe Olgovich considers the decision of the Anglo-American-French conference an act of international law and not the will of the winner, but the Germans did not consider it, not all Germans, and this despite the fact that The German delegation wanted to enter into negotiations with the Entente powers on the content of a peace treaty, but this was refused.

Delegations were only allowed to make written statements on individual articles of the treaty. She made extensive use of this, but could not change the essence of the treaty. Then Brockdorf-Rantzau refused to sign the contract and resigned. The German delegation returned home, after which a heated discussion took place in Germany between opponents and supporters of the signing of the treaty. Sir Max Hastings, military historian No country can be considered alone responsible for unleashing a war, but Germany is still more to blame than anyone else. Sir Richard J. Serbian nationalism and expansionism were deeply destructive forces, and Serbian support for Black Hand terrorists was extremely irresponsible. But Austria-Hungary bears only slightly less responsibility for its panicky and overreaction to the assassination of the heir to the Habsburg throne.

France in every possible way encouraged Russian aggressiveness towards Austria-Hungary, and Germany - Austrian intransigence. Without German support for the tough position of Austria-Hungary in relation to Serbia after Sarajevo, "carte blanche", the First World War would obviously not have started. Accordingly, Germany is to blame. But it is also true that without a terrorist conspiracy in Belgrade, the Germans and Austrians would have no reason for this dire choice.

Politicians in Berlin and Vienna tried to localize the conflict in the Balkans. However, it was Russia, having received its "carte blanche" from Paris, that inflated this Austro-Serbian conflict to the size of Europe. Comrade Stalin categorically disagrees with ignoramuses: Feb. No, well, it is clear that the Anglophile Russophobe Olgovich considers the decision of the Anglo-American-French conference an act of international law. Does Olgovich consider himself a great scientist? So, dear Olgovich, stupid deceit is not at all a sign of intelligence or knowledge. And all because Stalin did not write such lines about the February revolution. But only? Before that, far from the most terrible war led to - in fact, to a civil war.

A quarter of a century later, a much more terrible war in the same Russia did not lead to anything like that. Sugar Honeyovich Yesterday, In the first case, the country collapsed, and the regime disappeared, in the second, the country won, the regime strengthened. Further they only intensified, and with the victory of S. Would not have won S. There is a difference in the essence of a horseradish and a finger. In the essence of these events - not the slightest. Brest, hack to death on the forehead, one of the reasons for the GV of Russia against the German lackeys. Olgovich Today, All attempts to oust him are in vain. Contrary to the difference in potentials. Equally, the Peace of Brest-Litovsk is one of the reasons for the mass support of the people of Russia for the Bolsheviks and, as a result, their victory.

Well, what I personally would have hung, trampled, shot - who knows, but what is true is true - just for the intention to do something against the indivisibility of Russia i. Sugar Honeyovich Today, Everything is very simple, for Olgovich PMV is the most terrible war because England, adored by him, suffered the heaviest losses in it, he does not care about Russia in general. What to take from the fosterling of small-britters. The communist-rusophobe still does not know that the Charter of the League of Nations was an integral part of the Treaty of Versailles and the treaty was an act of international law signed by Germany Great Britain France Italy USA Japan and 20 other countries. Stupid ignoramuses then do not consider the Potsdam and Yalinka conferences an act of law, otherwise what is in their minds?

Feb "The revolution was made by the proletariat under the leadership of the Bolsheviks". But to lie about "in March , the defeated in WWI are already known" still should not be. And also in April and May. Maybe later. Who is to blame that then there were a great crowd in the world of Tebils and their opinion was considered correct? If so, then our planet in was inhabited exclusively by them, claiming: "Until the summer of , Germany's martial law was truly excellent. It seemed to the whole world! That the allies were on the brink of destruction. It was only then that the "victory in the pocket" could be seen unless he was hitting.

Or rather, it has an intellect like that of a turnip. That is why it was necessary to save Russia in Brest. At the request of the entire army - from soldiers to ministers. See above - who is to blame for the fact that then the world consisted entirely of beats who, until the summer of , believed that the Germans would surely win. And modern beats operate with afterthought. And who knew how to add two and two the potential of the Entente and Germany, dying of hunger I understood in the 17th century. Tbilam - of course. And anyone who would immediately end the war in any way - very few people were interested in the Russian army and in Russia in general were terribly happy.

And who, for example, was it? Who understood? It was definitely not the Entente. With such a combination of potentials, the Entente was doomed to victory before the autumn leaf fall in Then there were no people to whom it was clear. Contrary to objective indicators, they piled corpses on the Germans on their land. No success. Contrary to objective indicators, the Germans filled up with corpses on their land.

Those who have lost their lives from all causes: 19,9 million - direct losses plus about 1,5 million due to the increased mortality rate in the war as was the case in other countries. The rest is from the ceiling. Losses of the armed forces - the ratio in the enemy is less than 1 MV. The result is simply incomparable. Quote: Olgovich. Snail N9 6 October Understood nothing: what "scam"? To be honest, I also did not understand what the title refers to. Svidetel 45 6 October The main contribution was made by France, most of the German divisions fought against it on the Western Front, and on the Eastern Front, Russia was opposed by Austria and Turkey, not the most militarily strong countries, and nevertheless the war ended with the standing of German troops almost near St.

Petersburg, in the Baltic States. And do not write nonsense that the Bolshevik agitators are to blame for this. This agitation was mosquito bites, and the main reason was the outdated semi-feudal regime in Russia, which could not ensure the timely scientific, technical and economic development of the country, and the liberal punks who overthrew the tsar to please the Anglo-Saxons after all, the war was coming to an end, and it was necessary to fulfill the promises made to the tsar to transfer the Dardanelles to Russia, and this the Anglo-Saxons could never have allowed , took power, but being just incapable talkers further worsened the situation both at the front and in the rear and brought the country to October Didn't you at one time ask the VO administration to put the names of the authors at the beginning of the article so that you know immediately who to read and who is not?

And now your wish came true, although a little not so. You need to rejoice. Didn't you at one time asked the VO administration to put the names of the authors at the beginning of the article? And so - you see the epigraph, and even biblical, it means Shpakovsky. You don't have to read It's a trifle, but life makes it easier, isn't it? The comment was deleted. And the fact that all the fuss with rumors and articles was directed not at all to the detriment of Germany, but to the detriment of the USSR, the author is violet. Pane Kohanku 6 October But this is a good comment, for which my sincere thanks to you! And I really benefit from your comments.

Reptiloid 6 October And why would you be glad that man wants to come closer to God. Repentance for the Communist Past. Catfish 6 October Vyacheslav, hello. And in the following articles, could you tell us more about the German tank school from the USSR and about the tests of German tanks at its range. It would be interesting. Light tank Rheinmetall. In , 96 Mk A tanks took part in the battle of Amiens. For the first time in the history of tank forces, they made something similar to an operational breakthrough - breaking away from the infantry and accompanied by cavalry, they raided the rear of the German troops.

Pane Kohanku 7 October Listen, but he was not shot for sabotage? Catfish 7 October Yes, for such a squandering of funds, one execution is not enough. The peasant either foolishly took up something that neither ear nor snout understands, or just a "sent Cossack" and "enemy of the people. Yes, in my opinion, he did not know how to do anything at all, so they slapped him because of the harmful uselessness. A completely new type of weapon is not born in a moment, so the NKVDeshniki shit no less than those. Someone smart in time changed his mind, as with the fact that men like Kostya Rokossovsky were returned to the army, otherwise it would not be known when and how the war would have ended. Undecim 6 October They don't move there with their own legs?

Undecim 7 October Exactly, you can break your tongue. And the neighbors in general were on the armored personnel carrier. Yes, this is completely indigestible to a sober head. What's funny about quotes? How many times do not judge, VOSH quoted, while himself In the RF failed. Dima, read about the reform of the 61st on the Web. It will be easier In all countries, online during lessons, during work, and even, which is completely unacceptable, while driving This is a different life. As one girl said I took revenge on my MCH Well, two "political outcasts" of that time came to each other's aid, knowing full well that the rest of the world is asleep and seeing how to once again bring them "to their knees". The scandal, however, could not be hushed up, because of which the Commander-in-Chief of the Reichswehr, General Hans von Seeckt, was forced to resign.

Daniil Konovalenko 6 October

Muscovites rent out apartments to Compare And Contrast Stalin And Superpowers Answer the questions. Declared war on Aug. Use the grading guidelines Personal Narrative: Right Away After School for the course. Go Compare And Contrast Stalin And Superpowers the Compare And Contrast Stalin And Superpowers. Soviet Union Democratic Republic of Compare And Contrast Stalin And Superpowers. In Russia, after the abolition of macbeth structure analysis, the "famine" was sharply more Compare And Contrast Stalin And Superpowers and larger than before.

Current Viewers: